LUCKNOW: In a significant development in the ongoing dual citizenship case involving Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, a judge of the Allahabad High Court has withdrawn from the proceedings, citing complications during the hearing process.
According to a report, Justice Subhash Vidyarthi of the Lucknow bench recused himself from adjudicating the matter after what he described as an “unpleasant situation” arose during the course of the case. Following his decision, the judge formally requested the Chief Justice to assign the matter to a different bench for further consideration.
The case pertains to allegations that Rahul Gandhi holds dual citizenship, including that of the United Kingdom, which would be in violation of Indian law that does not permit dual nationality. The petition seeking legal action was filed by a private individual, prompting judicial scrutiny into the matter.
Reports indicate that procedural issues contributed to the judge’s decision to step aside. During earlier hearings, questions were raised regarding whether due process had been followed, particularly in relation to providing the concerned party an opportunity to be heard before any directive—such as the registration of a First Information Report (FIR)—was issued.
ALSO READ : Riddle of 16: What Rahul Gandhi Didn’t Say Out Loud — And why Naidu’s 16 MPs Are The Answer
Additionally, developments outside the courtroom also appeared to influence the course of proceedings. Observations suggest that certain actions by the petitioner, including comments made in public or on social media, may have created an environment that the court deemed inappropriate, thereby affecting the judicial process.
The recusal effectively pauses the current proceedings, with the matter now awaiting reassignment by the Chief Justice. Once a new bench is constituted, the case is expected to resume, potentially revisiting earlier directions and procedural questions tied to the allegations.
The issue has already witnessed multiple legal twists, including earlier directives related to filing an FIR and subsequent modifications to those orders. The latest development adds another layer of complexity to a case that continues to draw both legal and political attention.