What many thought was a controversy nearing its end has suddenly found a second life online.
Days after the viral “rs 370 Biryani” remark triggered outrage, cost a man his job, and led to legal action, a fresh conversation featuring the man at the centre of the storm and his former boss has set social media buzzing once again. This time, however, the debate isn’t about what was said on stage it’s about whether genuine regret ever followed.
The latest flashpoint comes from a widely shared conversation between Himanshu Jangra and his former employer, Vivek Vishwakarma. In the video, Jangra opens up about the aftermath of the controversy that turned him into one of the most discussed names on Indian social media over the past few weeks.
Speaking about losing his job, receiving legal notices, and facing public humiliation, Jangra said the incident had deeply affected his personal life. Family members, relatives, and even neighbours became aware of the controversy as clips continued to circulate online.
“I regret going to that show,” he said during the conversation, referring to the stand up comedy event where the remarks were made.
But while the statement was meant to explain his side of the story, many viewers came away with a different impression.
Across X, Instagram and Reddit, users questioned whether Jangra was expressing remorse for his comments or simply regretting the consequences that followed. Critics argued that nowhere in the conversation did he directly address why the original remarks had upset so many people.
The controversy dates back to a crowd work segment during comedian Pranit More’s show in Gurugram. During an interaction with the audience, Jangra narrated a dating experience and suggested that spending rs 370 on chicken biryani for a woman had created expectations of physical intimacy.
The clip exploded online almost instantly.
Thousands condemned the remarks as misogynistic and reflective of problematic attitudes towards consent. Others criticised the audience’s laughter and questioned why the comments were not challenged in the moment.
The backlash quickly moved beyond social media. Jangra lost his corporate job as outrage mounted, while attention also shifted towards comedian Pranit More, who was criticised for laughing along with the interaction instead of intervening.
What began as a viral comedy clip soon evolved into a larger conversation about dating expectations, consent, public accountability and the consequences of internet outrage.
The matter escalated further when Maharashtra Cyber Police registered an FIR against More, Jangra and others associated with the viral content. Authorities cited allegedly objectionable material circulated through online platforms, bringing legal scrutiny into what had initially been a social media controversy.
More recently, More himself issued a public apology, admitting that he should have handled the situation differently. The comedian acknowledged that he failed to intervene at the time and accepted responsibility for his response during the show.
Yet even as legal proceedings continue, public opinion remains sharply split.
One section of the internet believes the punishment has already been severe enough. They point to job loss, relentless trolling and legal action as consequences that far outweigh a poorly judged comment made during a comedy show.
Others disagree.
For them, the issue was never about a joke. It was about a mindset that appeared to link spending money on a date with entitlement, a view many argued deserved scrutiny and criticism.
That disagreement has now resurfaced with the viral conversation.
Was the FIR justified? Has public accountability crossed into public punishment? And can someone truly apologise if they only regret the fallout?
Those questions are once again dominating timelines, ensuring that the rs 370 Biryani controversy remains far from over.
What many thought was a controversy nearing its end has suddenly found a second life online.
Days after the viral “rs 370 Biryani” remark triggered outrage, cost a man his job, and led to legal action, a fresh conversation featuring the man at the centre of the storm and his former boss has set social media buzzing once again. This time, however, the debate isn’t about what was said on stage it’s about whether genuine regret ever followed.
The latest flashpoint comes from a widely shared conversation between Himanshu Jangra and his former employer, Vivek Vishwakarma. In the video, Jangra opens up about the aftermath of the controversy that turned him into one of the most discussed names on Indian social media over the past few weeks.
Speaking about losing his job, receiving legal notices, and facing public humiliation, Jangra said the incident had deeply affected his personal life. Family members, relatives, and even neighbours became aware of the controversy as clips continued to circulate online.
“I regret going to that show,” he said during the conversation, referring to the stand up comedy event where the remarks were made.
But while the statement was meant to explain his side of the story, many viewers came away with a different impression.
Across X, Instagram and Reddit, users questioned whether Jangra was expressing remorse for his comments or simply regretting the consequences that followed. Critics argued that nowhere in the conversation did he directly address why the original remarks had upset so many people.
The controversy dates back to a crowd work segment during comedian Pranit More’s show in Gurugram. During an interaction with the audience, Jangra narrated a dating experience and suggested that spending rs 370 on chicken biryani for a woman had created expectations of physical intimacy.
The clip exploded online almost instantly.
Thousands condemned the remarks as misogynistic and reflective of problematic attitudes towards consent. Others criticised the audience’s laughter and questioned why the comments were not challenged in the moment.
The backlash quickly moved beyond social media. Jangra lost his corporate job as outrage mounted, while attention also shifted towards comedian Pranit More, who was criticised for laughing along with the interaction instead of intervening.
What began as a viral comedy clip soon evolved into a larger conversation about dating expectations, consent, public accountability and the consequences of internet outrage.
The matter escalated further when Maharashtra Cyber Police registered an FIR against More, Jangra and others associated with the viral content. Authorities cited allegedly objectionable material circulated through online platforms, bringing legal scrutiny into what had initially been a social media controversy.
More recently, More himself issued a public apology, admitting that he should have handled the situation differently. The comedian acknowledged that he failed to intervene at the time and accepted responsibility for his response during the show.
Yet even as legal proceedings continue, public opinion remains sharply split.
One section of the internet believes the punishment has already been severe enough. They point to job loss, relentless trolling and legal action as consequences that far outweigh a poorly judged comment made during a comedy show.
Others disagree.
For them, the issue was never about a joke. It was about a mindset that appeared to link spending money on a date with entitlement, a view many argued deserved scrutiny and criticism.
That disagreement has now resurfaced with the viral conversation.
Was the FIR justified? Has public accountability crossed into public punishment? And can someone truly apologise if they only regret the fallout?
Those questions are once again dominating timelines, ensuring that the rs 370 Biryani controversy remains far from over.
ALSO READ: KEM Hospital Sends MBBS Student Sejal Pawar on 15-Day Leave Amid Pranit More Show Controversy
-
-
-
-
